Justice Hakeem Oshodi of an Ikeja High Court, Friday, ordered the Lagos State Office of the Public Defender (OPD) to take over the defence for alleged kidnap kingpin, Chukwudimeme Onwuamadike, alias Evans, due to his inability to afford his legal fees.

During Friday’s proceedings, the Attorney General of Lagos State, Moyosore Onigbanjo (SAN), informed the court that his team placed a phone call to the law chambers of Ladi Williams (SAN) and Co, who represented Evans at the last court date to enquire about the whereabouts of Evans’ counsel.

The attorney general noted that his team was informed by the law chambers that Evans had not “perfected their brief.”

The suspected kidnap kingpin, who was arraigned alongside five others on August 30, 2017 on two counts of conspiracy and kidnapping, has changed lawyers, at least, five times during the course of his trial.

Some of the lawyers, who have represented him include Olukoya Ogungbeje, Noel Brown and Olanrewaju Ajanaku.

Reacting to the absence of his defence counsel, Justice Oshodi noted that Evans had developed a habit of engaging the services of lawyers, who according to the Judge, “disappeared half-way through trial,” and this has caused delays in the case.

“There are five other defendants with different counsel, the interest of the first defendant (Evans) is not superior to those of the other defendants.

“The court will not breach Section 36(6) of the 1999 Constitution by going ahead with today’s business of the court, which is the hearing of the no-case submissions,” he said.

Justice Oshodi, thereafter, ordered an OPD counsel, who was in court, Ms. E.E. Okonkwo, to takeover Evans’ defence.

Following the Judge’s ruling, Evans co-defendants- Ogechi Uchechukwu, Chilaka Ifeanyi, Okwuchukwu Nwachukwu and Victor Aduba- filed no-case submissions, asking the court to dismiss the charges against them.

The second defendant, Uche Amadi, however, did not file a no-case submission.

The defence counsel, Roger Adewole, Olanrewaju Ajanaku, M.C. Izokwu and Emmanuel Ochai told the court that no prima facie (correct until proven otherwise) case has been made against the defendants by the state.

They, therefore, urged the court to dismiss the case against the defendants.

Responding, the attorney general asked the court to dismiss the four co-defendants’ no-case submissions, saying: “The defendants are asking the court to do something that cannot be done. They are asking the court to analyse evidence and go beyond the window that no-case submissions requires.

“All that the court needs to do is to show that there is prima facie evidence. There is before the court, legally admitable prima facie evidence enough for the defendants to enter their defence.

“I urge the court to dismiss all the applications and that the defendants proceed to enter into their defence.”

Justice Oshodi adjourned the case until August 14, this year, for ruling and possible continuation of trial.