Court Awards N36.6m Against Pharmacist Council, Lagos Over Unlawful Raid

668
Court Awards N36.6m Against Pharmacist Council, Lagos Over Unlawful Raid

A Federal High Court sitting in Lagos, has ordered the Pharmacist Council of Nigeria, Lagos State Task Force on Counterfeit Processed Food and others to pay the sum of N36.53 million to Edichart Investments Limited and two others for  the unlawful sealing and looting of their pharmacy.

The trial judge, Justice Okon Abang also awarded N1m as general damages in favour of Edichart Investments Limited, Samuel Edih and Alezander Ani Eton against the plaintiff for illegal closure of the pharmacy located at 45, Olarunlogbon Street, Antony Village, Lagos.
In his judgment on the seven year case, the judge held that the claims that the defendants failed to register the plaintiffs’ pharmacy was not tenable.
The judge, had before delivering the verdict, held that the judgment was within the 90 days required of a judge to give judgment from the day the case was concluded.
The defendants were not represented by counsel, but the plaintiffs’ counsel informed the court that the defence counsels were fully aware of the new date for the judgment.
In the judgment, Justice Abang agreed with the plaintiffs that the defendants acted outside their powers by sealing, raiding and carting away the plaintiffs’ drugs and also failing to grant their pharmacy licence, as they (defendants) failed to establish the proximity of another pharmacy to 45, Olarunlogbon Street, Antony Village, Lagos, which is where the plaintiffs’ pharmacy is situated.
The court awarded N35.53million in favour the plaintiffs against the defendants as special damages and N1m as general damages.
The plaintiffs had dragged Pharmacist Council of Nigeria, Lagos State Task Force on Counterfeit Processed Food, Mrs G.O. Balogun, Mrs Adeoye and Attorney General of Lagos State, to court on November 23, 2010, over the defendants’ raid on Edichart Investments Limited pharmacy and carting away its drugs and closing the place.
On Edichart Investments’ application for licence, the plaintiffs argued that the refused by Pharmacist Council of Nigeria to grant same, was its claim that its (Edichart) building on 45, Olarunlogbon Street, Antony Village, Lagos, was close to other pharmacy.
According the plaintiffs, the defendants on May 20, 2010 raided its pharmacy  and carted away drugs, while they (defendants) closed the massive drug shop from May 20, 2010 to August 10, 2010 and from December 9, 2010 to August 4, 2011, a period of about 317 days.
The plaintiffs had further stated that while hearing in the suit commenced on November 23, 2010, Pharmacist Council of Nigeria, by a letter dated November 3, but served on the plaintiffs on November 30, 2010, which was backdated, claimed the reason for not granting the 1st plaintiff’s  (Edichart) premises licence was close to other premises (pharmacy).
According to the plaintiffs, “Curiously, this issue of proximity was not mention in the contravention notice dated May 27, 2010 issued and served same day on Edichart at Pharmacist Council of Nigeria’s office. The name of the premises, the nature of the pharmaceutical practice and when the said premises was registered were never disclosed.”
The plaintiffs added that “In the course of cross-examining DW1 (defence witness) on November 5, 2015 by the plaintiffs’ counsel, DW1 was asked whether he was a Surveyor or has a measuring tape. He answered he was neither a Surveyor nor had a measuring tape. He was further questioned on  whether he has any document which shows that Edichart’s premises is less than 50 or 200 metres from another registered premises, he answered he has but that the document was in his office. Still under cross-examination, DW1 was asked whether there was any other pharmacy on Edichart street, he answered there was no other pharmacy.”
The plaintiffs had told the court that the failure of Pharmacist Council of Nigeria to show or tender the purported document which showed that the plaintiffs premises is less than 200 or 50 metres from all alleged registered premises, amounts to withholding evidence.